Field Burning Links:

A Brief History Your Health Is it Necessary Alternatives What OTA is Doing What You Can Do

Status

Take Action!

Legislation

Press Room

Resources

More Links:

How to File a Complaint

Clean Air For All - The Campaign to End Field Burning

VICTORY!

SB 528, the measure that ends field burning in the Willamette Valley, was passed by the both Oregon House and the Senate.

Field burning will be prohibited altogether in 2010. Except for some exempted steep terrain east near Silverton, farmers can burn a cap of 20,000 acres in 2009. Propane flaming and stack and pile burning is to be phased down before being completely banned in 2013.

The Governor has indicated that he will sign the bill into law.

The issue turned on the ability of public health advocates to help lawmakers understand that field burning is detrimental to healthy lungs and healthy hearts.

For example, OTA Board Member and registered nurse Carla Hervert has spoken passionately for the health of her asthma patients whose condition is worsened every summer by field burning smoke. OTA also submitted our report on field burning and hazardous air toxins as testimony at the Legislature.

Read the report

OTA extends a hearty congratulations to Representative Paul Holvey, sponsor of the bill. We worked closely with Rep. Holvey in the 2007 to frame the field burning debate as a public health issue. He has worked tirelessly on this issue!

We also congratulate our partners Western Environmental Law Center on this 2009 victory – they took the lead to bring strong testimony to Oregon’s elected officials and the press.

Full story in the Register Guard...

A Brief History

Beginning in the late 40’s, field burning was used by grass seed farmers as a means to destroy pests and plant diseases, control weeds, and boost seed yields.  As the residential population of the Willamette Valley grew (and the inconveniences due to field burning with it), field burning came under more and more criticism.  Then in 1988, decreased visibility due to field burning smoke caused a deadly traffic accident on I-5.  The Oregon Legislature couldn’t ignore the problem any more.  In 1991, they approved a phase-down that capped open field burning in the Willamette Valley at 65,000 acres.  At the time, the major concerns were the obvious problems with burning: difficulties with breathing and visibility during the burns.  The risks from small particulates were still unknown.

Field Burning and Your Health

Grass seed field burning produces thousands of tons of air pollution, creating a public health crisis in Oregon every summer.  Many residents are forced to stay inside, keep their children inside, miss work, and even leave their homes to find clearer skies.  They experience headaches, itchy eyes, scratchy throats, difficulties in breathing, nosebleeds, nausea, fatigue, stress, and fear.  These are only some of the obvious affects of field burning.  In reality, field burning affects us all. 

The smoke from field burning contains small particles (fine particulate matter) that penetrate deep into our lungs and cannot be filtered out.  The American Medical Association has found that even short-term exposure to these particles increases the risk for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases including diabetes, arrhythmia, asthma, heart failure, and cardiac arrest.  In fact, an increase of 10 micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter results in an 11 percent increase in the number of strokes. Exactly such an increase occurred on July 10^th, 2007 in Eugene when a small field burn near Harrisbug went awry.  Bigger increases due to field burns have been recorded elsewhere.

Children are especially vulnerable.  Early exposure to smoke can lead to a lifetime of respiratory ailments and decreased lung capacity.  Particulate pollution has been linked to infant death, premature birth, and low birth weight.

The Oregon Medical Association, the American Lung Association of Oregon and the Lane County Medical Society have all expressed concerns about the health affects of field burning. All three support a ban to field burning.,

Go to Field Burning and Your Health for more detailed information about field burning and your health, including a list of toxics contained in the smoke.

Is Burning Necessary?

Since the 1991 cap on field burning, the number of acres burned has decreased by 90%, yet grass seed production has doubled and the industry has continued to grow.  Furthermore, field burning has been banned in Washington and Idaho, and their grass seed industry continues to prosper.  Field burning is an outdated practice that is not longer necessary.  It continues more out of resistance to change than out of necessity

What are the Alternatives?

The research conducted as a result of the 1991 legislation identified a variety of alternative practices and strategies that farmers can use to lessen their dependence on fertilizers and herbicides and avoid the need for fire.

In addition to ridding themselves of unwanted straw farmers have used burning as a means to control weeds and prevent fungal disease. Research has also identified ways of addressing these two problems:

• New rotation crops - Meadowfoam is a broad-leaf plant whose seed oil is used in cosmetics. When harvested the field is largely free of unwanted grasses and ready to be planted in ryegrass or fescue.
• New grass seed strains - Fungal disease is now successfully avoided by using later flowering seed strains

The grass stalks left over after harvesting the seed can be:

• Mulched - Finely chopped up and left on the field, stalks help preserve soil moisture, improve soil tilth, prevent erosion, suppress weed growth and reduce fertilizer needs;
• Composted - Straw pushed off the field, into windrows, and mixed with nitrogen provides a future soil amendment;
• Bailed and sold as livestock feed - A $60 million industry has developed to harvest and ship the straw to countries in Asia.

Clean Air for All is brought to you by your statewide advocacy group Oregon Toxics Alliance and the Western Environmental Law Center.